maybe we should stop saying racism=privilege+prejudice
Most importantly, the problem with the formulation is that it misconstrues the nature of power. In a capitalist system viewed as a whole, almost all power is economic. Political power, institutional power, police power, military power, all of these are a function of capital and its uses and the extent to which an entity possesses power in a capitalist system is inextricably linked to its ability to manipulate capital. The notion of power that the Racism Formula uses is somewhat different. It asserts power as being a sort of social mechanism that the dominant social group, in this case whites, wield exclusively. Put another way, the Racism Formula assumes that if one is not white one has no access to power because power is monolithic. This is a necessary corollary to the definition’s sole purpose for existing, ie, to excuse blacks of racism.
That power is not exclusively social and is not monolithic is demonstrated quite easily. In a fair fight between two equally matched men each man has a fifty fifty chance of victory assuming a stalemate is impossible. Give one man a weapon and he has more power over the other man because all else being equal, the advantage of the weapon assures the victory of the armed man. The unarmend man must do as the armed man says or die. Call this the fundamental principle of power and it is a model of how all power works. In a capitalist system, all power therefore becomes economic because a man can leverage his economic resources to give him the advantage in any such contest, and as a result assure his victory.
It would seem then that this bears out the Racism Formula since whites, as a group, have greater access to capital than all other minority groups combined. The problem is of course that people rarely act as a group and in the vast majority of contests, it is individuals pitted against individuals. As such, there are circumstances where an individual member of a minority group does in fact have much more power than a member of another group, or even many such members. Oprah Winfrey, for example, is the wealthiest black woman in America, possibly in the world. She wields a tremendous amount of power as a result. In most contests, were Oprah Winfrey to be confronted with an overtly racist organization such as the Christian Identity Church, Oprah Winfrey would mop the floor with those scumbags because she’s more powerful than they are. This mismatch of power doesn’t make the Christian Identity Church any less than they are, nor does it make Oprah Winfrey racist herself. It simply shows that power is much more fluid and individualized than the racism formula acknowledges.
68 notes
-
grapefruitunhinged likes this
-
actyourrage reblogged this from greenstate and added:
Interesting thoughts.
-
weakdaes reblogged this from ericmortensen
-
shadow-hikari reblogged this from thenoobyorker and added:
The problem with this clarification is that it starts conflating each definition of power. Yes, economic power is very...
-
xtremecaffeine reblogged this from le-kif-kif
-
le-kif-kif reblogged this from therapsida and added:
i dont agree with the assessment that all power is economic, yes, but access to capital and social mobility is the most...
-
therapsida reblogged this from le-kif-kif and added:
I get what you’re saying but wouldn’t this construction validate other things besides anti-white racism (which duh...
-
tsotchke reblogged this from le-kif-kif
-
sundays-end reblogged this from greenstate and added:
To me if you think any race is inherently “better” than any other race, you are a racist. Institutionalized racism does...
-
ericmortensen reblogged this from thenoobyorker
-
greenstate reblogged this from thenoobyorker
-
gaypher reblogged this from thenoobyorker and added:
i am reminded of libertarians you guys sure you wanna go down this road
-
thenoobyorker reblogged this from le-kif-kif and added:
I am reminded of Baron Desai’s claims that capitalism favors no people or country. It is this blogger’s belief that if...
-
prellung likes this
-
charlottelynn likes this
-
autoluminescent likes this
-
ovarian-planarian likes this
-
urshermaleek likes this
-
eveningtales likes this
-
asystoles likes this
-
offbeatorbit reblogged this from le-kif-kif and added:
I honestly think that your extreme examples—using one of the richest women in the world and the leader of the most...
-
thefuckwouldisaywhatfor likes this
-
headist likes this
-
bricorama likes this
-
frostymalinche likes this
-
ecstasybread likes this
-
3of5 likes this
-
homewreckerbitch likes this
-
kofferfraulein likes this
-
pickledhappiness likes this
-
colorblinding reblogged this from darkjez and added:
I agree with your point, but I also think weexist-weresist has a point as well. I didn’t have time/don’t have time to...
-
ourcatastrophe likes this
-
akacocolopez likes this
-
darkjez reblogged this from colorblinding and added:
Except all power isn’t essentially economic. This argument has been being made for a looong time and it isn’t any truer...
-
colorblinding likes this
-
sophiepierre reblogged this from le-kif-kif and added:
Ever since I encountered the ‘racism equals prejudice plus power’ definition on the internet, I’ve found it hard to...
-
zombifytherainbow likes this
-
myselfandmyother reblogged this from le-kif-kif
-
clearlykero reblogged this from le-kif-kif
-
heroin-e reblogged this from le-kif-kif
-
bonekeeper likes this
-
steelcanvasandcopperwire reblogged this from le-kif-kif
-
steelcanvasandcopperwire likes this
-
feminismfreedomfighters reblogged this from le-kif-kif and added:
I think this is part of what I was trying to get at, but much more economically driven and precise.
-
callimeric likes this
-
futurefutures likes this
-
sahteen likes this
-
atrapforfools reblogged this from le-kif-kif
-
atrapforfools likes this
- Show more notes